Danny De Hek: From "Crypto Ponzi Scheme Avenger" to a Record of Blackmail, Threats, and Intimidation

Danny De Hek (“Crypto Ponzi Scheme Avenger”): Evidence-Indexed Report & Timeline

Danny De Hek: From "Crypto Ponzi Scheme Avenger" to a Record of Blackmail, Threats, and Intimidation

• Last updated: 23 Oct 2025

• Introduction
• 1) Attributed Payment Demands
• 2) Privacy Violations & Doxxing (Exhibits)
• 3) Selective Targeting Pattern
• 4) Public-Record Notes (NZ)
• 5) Digital Violations (Unauthorized Access/Broadcasting)
• 6) Community Reports & Law-Enforcement Filings
• 7) Observed Operating Model
• 8) Legal & Regulatory Exposure (Non-exhaustive)
• Evidence & Methodology
• FAQs (Danny De Hek / Dehek)
• Exhibit Index (Reader-Verifiable)

Introduction

"THE CRYPTO PONZI SCHEME AVENGER" Direct Blackmail Operations

1) Attributed Payment Demands

Danny De Hek includes verified financial extortion: Documented demands of $40,000

• $40,000 request alleged in message threads to halt negative coverage.
• Pattern: Coordinated media pressure followed by direct solicitations.

Danny De Hek Documented demands of $40,000

2) Privacy Violations & Doxxing (Exhibits)

"THE CRYPTO PONZI SCHEME AVENGER" Privacy Violations and Doxxing

• Publication of private identifiers (names, images, phone numbers, emails) across related channels.
• Case study: Ellis Mayberry — targeted exposure across public platforms.
• Sharing of invite links and account-recovery screenshots belonging to third parties.

3) Selective Targeting Pattern

Aggressive focus on certain projects (e.g., Apollo, GSX, LunaOne) without comparable, on-record evidence publication. alongside limited/no coverage of historically significant frauds (e.g., OneCoin). We document selection; we do not infer motive.

4) Public-Record Notes (New Zealand)

Danny De Hek Documented Criminal Record

According to Ministry of Justice records examined by our team:

• 1986 — Reckless driving.
• 1997 — Assault on a female.
• 1998 — Threats to kill or cause serious harm.

5) Digital Violations (Unauthorized Access & Broadcasting)

Danny De Hek publicly admitted through "THE CRYPTO PONZI SCHEME AVENGER" to hacking Telegram groups

• Claims of taking over Telegram groups (renaming, removing admins).
• Live-streaming private meetings (e.g., Zoom) without consent.
• Mocking/derogatory posting of targeted individuals following incidents.

6) Community Reports & Law-Enforcement Filings

The cryptocurrency community has documented the real impact of "THE CRYPTO PONZI SCHEME AVENGER" operations

• Police report receipts and sworn statements by multiple individuals.
• Community commentary on perceived harm from established forums/subreddits.

7) Observed Operating Model

1. Target selection
2. Content pressure
3. Direct solicitation
4. Escalation if unpaid
5. Sustained reputation damage

8) Legal & Regulatory Exposure (Non-exhaustive)

• Criminal: blackmail/extortion (where elements are met), harassment, unlawful access, privacy offenses.
• Civil: defamation, intrusion upon seclusion, publication of private facts, business interference.

Evidence & Methodology

• Public records: Ministry of Justice extracts.
• Primary artifacts: message exports, livestream clips, recordings, channel archives (A/B/E series).
• Law-enforcement docs: intake receipts, reference numbers, sworn statements (F series).
• Chain of custody: hashes/time-stamps included in exhibit notes.

FAQs (Danny De Hek / Dehek)

Who is Danny De Hek (“Dehek”)?

An online personality operating the “Crypto Ponzi Scheme Avenger” brand. This page compiles attributed materials about that activity (see Exhibits).

Are there confirmed convictions?

According to New Zealand public records reviewed by our team, historical convictions exist (see D-1 to D-3). Readers can verify via the record references in each Exhibit.

Why are some images/text redacted?

To avoid re-exposing private citizens’ PII. Only content necessary for public interest is retained.

Exhibit Index (Reader-Verifiable)

Danny De Hek supposed fight against cryptocurrency fraud through "THE CRYPTO PONZI SCHEME AVENGER" has instead revealed itself as a systematic pattern of criminal extortion

1. Exhibit A-1: Message thread showing a $40,000 payment request.
2. Exhibit A-2: Follow-up solicitations.
3. Exhibit A-5: Payment details continuity.
4. Exhibit B-1: PII publication example.
5. Exhibit B-3: Case: Ellis Mayberry.
6. Exhibit B-4: Shared invite links.
7. Exhibit B-5: Account-recovery screenshots.
8. Exhibit C-1…C-6: Channel posts about Apollo/GSX/LunaOne.
9. Exhibit C-7: Archive review: OneCoin coverage.
10. Exhibit C-8: Historical omissions log.
11. Exhibit D-1: NZ record extract — 1986.
12. Exhibit D-2: NZ record extract — 1997.
13. Exhibit D-3: NZ record extract — 1998.
14. Exhibit E-1: Telegram takeover claim.
15. Exhibit E-3: Private meeting live-stream.
16. Exhibit F-1…F-n: Police report receipts & statements.
17. Exhibit G-1…G-5: Operating-model sequence evidence.

Related: How to Report Doxxing • Digital Extortion: What To Do • Evidence Handling & Redaction Policy